Scaling Seller Effectiveness with an AI Knowledge Assistant: A Human-Centered Adoption Story
Background: A Productivity Problem Hiding in Plain Sight
At large technology companies, sales teams often serve as the bridge between customers and deeply technical engineering organizations. But when sellers need highly technical answers to customer questions, things can get complicated.
At one such company, sellers routinely spent days or even weeks locating the right engineer who might know the answer. Success depended heavily on internal networks — a system that favored tenured employees and left newer sellers at a disadvantage. Engineers, meanwhile, were inundated with requests that pulled them away from their core work.
In short:
Knowledge was fragmented
Response times were slow
Documentation was often out of date
Sellers relied on relationships instead of systems
Engineers bore an unsustainable support burden
The organization needed a new way to deliver fast, accurate, consistent information to technical sellers, without requiring armies of engineers to manually triage questions.
The Solution: An Internal AI-Powered Knowledge Assistant
The company’s Sales AI team began building a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) chatbot designed to pull from trusted internal sources and provide fast, consistent answers. But the team recognized that technology alone wouldn’t solve the problem; adoption would hinge on trust, usability, clarity, and cultural alignment.
That’s where I came in.
My Role: Leading the Human Side of Adoption
I served as the overall change lead, with a team supporting communications, training, and structured change management. Crucially, I was brought in early, while the tool was still being developed — allowing human factors to shape the solution instead of being retrofitted later.
My team partnered with the Sales AI technical team to:
1. Ground the solution in real user pain
We activated an existing global change champion network (established for a broader sales transformation) to gather firsthand stories, use cases, and frustrations. This early input sharpened the tool’s design and ensured sellers saw themselves in the solution.
2. Build a compelling narrative for why the change mattered
We crafted a clear, consistent story about:
Why this tool was being built
How it addressed real seller pain
What would improve in their day-to-day workflows
What the tool could do, and what it could not
This narrative helped set realistic expectations for both sellers and leadership.
3. Create trust-building guardrails
Because accuracy was essential, we worked with subject-matter experts to:
Establish accuracy thresholds before expanding access
Define when human validation was required
Clarify what could be shared publicly vs. only with NDA-protected clients
Educate teams on RAG vs. GPT — specifically, why hallucinations were not a risk with this system
These guardrails became foundational to responsible use.
4. Prepare both sellers and engineers
A key insight: even though engineers weren’t the primary users, their behavior could undermine adoption. If engineers kept directly answering questions as they always had, sellers would never build trust in the new tool.
We worked with engineering teams to shift their behavior so they rerouted sellers to the AI assistant and reinforced its validity.
5. Enable confidence through communication and training
We launched a full enablement ecosystem:
Intranet articles and videos
Executive communications
Live demos and office hours
On-demand training and step-by-step guides
Regular feedback loops with champions
“Rules of the road” for appropriate use
This combination helped sellers adopt the tool gradually and confidently.
6. Advocate for a phased rollout
Instead of trying to be everything, everywhere, all at once, we launched first for data center sellers, then expanded into other segments (client, network, etc.). This allowed us to build trust, improve accuracy, and demonstrate quick wins before scaling.
The Impact
Within six months of launch:
The user base grew from a few hundred early testers to ~5,000 global users
The AI assistant resolved more than 90% of queries
The organization saw an estimated $4M in annual savings
Sellers reported finding answers in minutes instead of days or weeks
Onboarding time for new sellers dropped significantly
Engineers reclaimed time to focus on their core work
The successful rollout paved the way for a broader, company-wide AI platform (“OneAI”)
As one seller put it: “This used to take me the better part of a week. Now I get answers in real time while I’m still in front of the customer.”
Lessons Learned
Two insights stand out:
1. Change and culture must be addressed early — not as an afterthought.
By shaping the strategy to address human factors during development, we prevented misalignment, unrealistic expectations, and resistance. This is where most AI pilots fail.
2. Adoption requires influence far beyond the core user.
Engineers, leaders, and operations teams all played a role in whether the change would stick. Adoption is a system, not a silo.
And a final leadership insight: In the AI era, leaders must get closer to the technology. They need to understand its strengths, limitations, and risks — not just approve the vision.
Why This Matters
This case study illustrates a universal truth: AI success lives or dies in the human layer.
Not in the model.
Not in the code.
In the culture, trust, behaviors, expectations, and mindsets that surround it.
For this company, addressing those human elements early meant unlocking enormous value: faster sales cycles, empowered sellers, and a blueprint for scaling AI responsibly.